Summary
In Proctor v. Clarke (3 Redf. 445) the surrogate held that a will executed by an unmarried woman, which was revoked by her subsequent marriage, was not revived by a codicil duly executed after her marriage, and it was said that "to re-establish the instrument of August 25th, 1873, as a will, there must be a re-execution or a new execution of it. The same formalities must be complied with as in the first instance."
Summary of this case from Matter of StickneyOpinion
No. 12–5307.
10-01-2012
Erin Dean PROCTOR, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.