From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proctor v. Ault

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 31, 1973
198 S.E.2d 671 (Ga. 1973)

Opinion

27942.

SUBMITTED MAY 15, 1973.

DECIDED MAY 31, 1973.

Habeas corpus. Butts Superior Court. Before Judge Sosebee.

James Proctor, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.


Applicant for writ of habeas corpus filed his petition alleging that he was arrested on September 21, 1971, without a warrant on a drug possession charge and sentenced to a term of 5 years; that he is being illegally detained because said sentence is null and void as being in conflict with his rights under the State and Federal Constitutions. The respondent made a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in that the petition did not comply with Code Ann. § 50-127 (2) which requires the petition to identify the proceeding in which petitioner was convicted, together with the date of the final judgment complained of. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss and the applicant appeals. Held:

The applicant's petition states that he is without counsel and "unskilled in the science of the law." As shown above the petition alleges the basic grounds for the writ as required by Code Ann. § 50-127 (1). This meets the minimum notice requirements to state a claim under the CPA sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED MAY 15, 1973 — DECIDED MAY 31, 1973.


Summaries of

Proctor v. Ault

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 31, 1973
198 S.E.2d 671 (Ga. 1973)
Case details for

Proctor v. Ault

Case Details

Full title:PROCTOR v. AULT

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 31, 1973

Citations

198 S.E.2d 671 (Ga. 1973)
198 S.E.2d 671

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Forrester

We have held that a petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the technical requirements of…