From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Procter v. Fez Club

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 9, 1966
76 N.M. 241 (N.M. 1966)

Opinion

No. 7845.

May 9, 1966.

Appeal from the District Court, Bernalillo County, D.A. Macpherson, Jr., D.J.

McAtee, Toulouse, Marchiondo, Ruud Gallagher, Albuquerque, for appellants.

Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl Harris, Albuquerque, for appellee.


This appeal involves a dismissal under Rule 41(e) (§ 21-1-1(41) (e), N.M.S.A. 1953). The complaint was filed July 20, 1962. The answer was filed August 15, 1962. Plaintiff filed a motion for immediate trial setting on November 13, 1963. Defendant's motion to dismiss was filed September 1, 1964. The order dismissing under Rule 41(e) was filed December 21, 1964.

Plaintiffs' motion to set the case for trial, made prior to defendant's motion to dismiss, prevents a dismissal under Rule 41(e). Martin v. Leonard Motor-El Paso, 75 N.M. 219, 402 P.2d 954; Foster v. Schwartzman, 75 N.M. 632, 409 P.2d 267; Kennedy v. Nelson, 76 N.M. 299, 414 P.2d 518, decided March 21, 1966.

The order of the trial court is reversed. The case is remanded with instructions to reinstate the complaint and to place the cause on the trial docket.

It is so ordered.

CARMODY, C.J., and COMPTON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Procter v. Fez Club

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 9, 1966
76 N.M. 241 (N.M. 1966)
Case details for

Procter v. Fez Club

Case Details

Full title:RAY PROCTER AND PAULINE PROCTER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FEZ CLUB, A…

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: May 9, 1966

Citations

76 N.M. 241 (N.M. 1966)
414 P.2d 219

Citing Cases

Summit Electric Supply Company, Inc. v. Rhodes Salmon, P.C

However, a plaintiffs filing of a re-quest for a trial setting before a defendant's filing of a motion to…

State ex Rel. Reynolds v. Molybdenum Corp. of Amer

The action taken was the filing of the motion for trial setting. See in accord Procter v. Fez Club, 76 N.M.…