From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Procell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 18, 1962
356 S.W.2d 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 34394.

April 18, 1962.

Appeal from the County Court, Nacogdoches County, A. W. Bell, J.

Marion G. Holt, Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is the unlawful sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $250.

The information alleges that the sale was made in Nacogdoches County, a dry area.

The state concedes that there is no proof that said County was a dry area, without which the conviction cannot stand. Hargiss v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 339 S.W.2d 538; Smith v. State, 159 Tex.Crim. R., 264 S.W.2d 106; Brown v. State, 135 Tex.Crim. 3, 117 S.W.2d 107.

The state's brief also points out that there is no proof of the sale except by a statement of the appellant before a grand jury.

The evidence being insufficient to sustain the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Procell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 18, 1962
356 S.W.2d 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
Case details for

Procell v. State

Case Details

Full title:James PROCELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 18, 1962

Citations

356 S.W.2d 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
172 Tex. Crim. 247

Citing Cases

Stell v. State

       See 3 Branch's Ann.P.C.2d ed. § 1307, p. 69.        In order to sustain a conviction the State must…