From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co. v. Valley Corp. B.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
CASE NO.: CV10 -G5533-EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV10 -G5533-EJD

10-27-2011

PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, a District of Columbia, Risk Retention Group, Plaintiff, v, VALLEY CORP. B., a California Corporation formerly known as R.J. HAAS CORP.; R.J. Haas, an individual; TY LEVINE, an individual; and KAREN LEVINE, an individual, Defendants.

YARON & ASSOCIATES GEORGE D. YARON JAMESI.SILVERSTE1N HIELAM CHAN Attorneys for Plaintiff PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG


GEORGE D. YARON, ESQ. (State Bar #96246).

JAMES I. SILVERSTEIN, ESQ! (State Bar #143543)

HIELAM CHAN, ESQ. (Slate Bar #267321)

YARON & ASSOCIATES

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

STIPULATION RE JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, ("ProBuilders") and Defendant TATSUKO ADACHI ("Mrs. Adachi"), that Mrs. Adachi will be bound by the Judgment that ProBuilders obtains, in the instant action, with respect to ProBuilders' claim for Declaratory Relief as to rescinding ProBuilders policy no. COM 5010992 ("the ProBuilders Policy").

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint on July 12, 2011;

WHEREAS Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint named Mrs. Adachi as a Defendant based upon her status as an additional insured under the ProBuilders Policy;

WHEREAS, in the instant action, ProBuilders seeks to rescind the ProBuilders Policy based upon alleged misrepresentations made by Valley Corp. B, a California Corporation formerly known as R.J. Haas Corp.;

WHEREAS, in the instant action, the only claim for relief alleged against Mrs. Adachi is ProBuilders' Third Claim for Relief for Declaratory Relief regarding ProBuilders' claim for rescission;

WHEREAS, ProBuilders has provided Mrs. Adachi with a copy of the Second Amended Complaint, in the instant action;

WHEREAS, Mrs. Adachi has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, in the instant action;

WHEREAS, Mrs. Adachi would like to avoid making an appearance in the instant action;

WHEREAS, ProBuilders has advised Mrs. Adachi that she should consult with an attorney before executing the instant Stipulation;

WHEREAS, Mrs. Adachi has agreed to be bound by the Court's determination of ProBuilder's Third Claim for Relief for Declaratory Relief regarding ProBuilders' claim for rescission;

THEREFORE, ProBuilders and Mrs. Adachi Stipulate that (1) ProBuilders' will not serve the Summons and Second Amended Complaint upon Mrs. Adachi, in the instant action: (2) Mrs. Adachi will be bound by the Court's determination of ProBuilder's Third Claim for Relief for Declaratory Relief regarding ProBuilders' claim for rescission, in the instant action; and (3) ProBuilders and Mrs. Adachi shall bear their own costs and fees, in the instant action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

YARON & ASSOCIATES

GEORGE D. YARON

JAMESI.SILVERSTE1N

HIELAM CHAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY, RRG

TATSUKO ADACHI SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I am over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action. I am employed in the County of San Francisco; my business address is Yaron & Associates, 601 California Street, Suite 2100, San Francisco, California 94108.

On October 26, 2011, 1 served the within:

STIPULATION RE .JUDGMENT on all parties in this action, as addressed below, by causing a true copy thereof to be distributed as follows:

TO ALL PARTIES ON THE ECF SERVICE LIST

× VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE: I served a true copy, with all exhibits, electronically on designated recipients through PACER.. Upon completion of electronic transmission of said document(s), a receipt is issued to serving party acknowledging receipt by PACER's system. Once PACER has served all designated recipients, proof of electronic service is returned to the filing party which will be maintained with the original document(s) in our office. This service complies with CCP §101.6.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on October 26, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

LYDIA BURTON

1burton@yaronlaw. com

Judge Edward J. Davila


Summaries of

Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co. v. Valley Corp. B.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
CASE NO.: CV10 -G5533-EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co. v. Valley Corp. B.

Case Details

Full title:PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, a District of Columbia, Risk…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: CV10 -G5533-EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)