From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Probst v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 19, 2022
No. 17297-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 19, 2022)

Opinion

17297-21S

09-19-2022

DAVID A. PROBST, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

DIANA L. LEYDEN SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE

For cause, it is

ORDERED that the parties' proposed stipulated decision, filed September 19, 2022, is recharacterized as a stipulation of settlement. In order to give effect to the basis of settlement reflected in that document, it is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there is no deficiency in Federal income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, petitioner for the taxable year 2018; and

That there is not any accuracy-related penalty due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018 under the provisions of I.R.C. § 6662(a).


Summaries of

Probst v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 19, 2022
No. 17297-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Probst v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. PROBST, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 19, 2022

Citations

No. 17297-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 19, 2022)