From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Probert v. Clorox Co., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2010
404 F. App'x 486 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1298.

December 9, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 07-CV-0139, Judge Dee V. Benson.

Todd E. Zenger, Kirton McConkie, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued, for plaintiffs-appellants.

David R., Wright, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David R. Todd and Clinton E. Duke.

Before GAJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Probert v. Clorox Co., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2010
404 F. App'x 486 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Probert v. Clorox Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David D. PROBERT and Jacklyn O. Probert, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. The…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

404 F. App'x 486 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Sportvision, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media L.P.

the burden of establishing damages, ” to “consider[] all information concerning royalty rates for the patent…

Positive Techs., Inc. v. Sony Elecs., Inc.

See Probert v. The Clorox Co., 258 F.R.D. 491, 500 (D. Utah 2009) aff'd sub nom. Probert v. Clorox Co., Inc.,…