Opinion
Case No. 6:10-cv-1508-Orl-31DAB.
December 28, 2010
ORDER
The matter is before the Court on the Motion by Intervenor, BRS Group, Inc. ("BRS") (Doc. 8) to Stay Arbitration and Plaintiff's Response thereto (Doc. 15); Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Litigation (Doc. 14) and Defendant's Response (Doc. 21); Defendant's Motion to Stay Arbitration (Doc 21) and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 24).
Amended on December 2, 2010 by Doc. 26 to provide a certification pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g).
Upon consideration of the above, the Court finds that the Arbitration Agreement in the subcontract between Pro Sound and BRS is enforceable. Accordingly, pursuant to Pro Sound's election, all disputes between Pro Sound and BRS arising out of or related to the subcontract shall be submitted to binding arbitration administered by the AAA in accordance with its Construction Industry Arbitration Rules. It is, therefore ORDERED that:
As conceded by Plaintiff, both BRS and Pro Sound may raise their respective claims against each other in the arbitration proceeding, and both may recover such damages as they are entitled to receive (Doc. 15, p. 7).