Summary
finding continuous belief of ownership required when tacking to prior owner's time of possession
Summary of this case from Stewart v. RaderOpinion
No. 93,400.
July 8, 2005.
Appeal from Wyandotte
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Pro Care Auto, LLC v. Hillhouse
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jul 8, 2005
114 P.3d 1000 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)
Summaries of
Pro Care Auto, LLC v. Hillhouse
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jul 8, 2005
114 P.3d 1000 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)
finding continuous belief of ownership required when tacking to prior owner's time of possession
Summary of this case from Stewart v. RaderCase details for
Pro Care Auto, LLC v. Hillhouse
Case Details
Full title:PRO CARE AUTO, LLC v. HILLHOUSE
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jul 8, 2005
Citations
114 P.3d 1000 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)
Citing Cases
Stewart v. Rader
When using tacking to support an adverse possession claim, the claimant must show a continual belief in…