From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pritchett v. Gentry

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 23, 2023
2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA

01-23-2023

Shawn Pritchett, Petitioner v. Jo Gentry, et. al., Respondents


ORDER EXTENDING REPLY DEADLINE TO FEBRUARY 24, 2023 [ECF NO. 90]

Jennifer A. Dorsey U.S. District Judge

Respondents bring an unopposed motion to extend the time to file a reply to their motion to dismiss. This is Respondents' second request for an extension of this deadline. While I find good cause exists to grant the motion, I will only extend this deadline by 30 days, as the motion to dismiss has been pending since June 13, 2022.

ECF No. 90.

ECF No. 76.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time [ECF No. 90] is GRANTED in part. Respondents have until February 24, 2023, to file a reply to the motion to dismiss. Absent extraordinary circumstances, further requests for an extension of this deadline will be viewed unfavorably.


Summaries of

Pritchett v. Gentry

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 23, 2023
2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Pritchett v. Gentry

Case Details

Full title:Shawn Pritchett, Petitioner v. Jo Gentry, et. al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2023)