From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pritchett v. Gentry

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA

11-28-2022

Shawn Pritchett, Petitioner v. Jo Gentry, et. al., Respondents


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

[ECF NO. 88]

Jennifer A. Dorsey U.S. District Judge

Respondents bring an unopposed motion to extend the time to file a reply to their motion to dismiss. This is respondents' first request for an extension of this deadline. With good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time [ECF No. 88] is GRANTED. Respondents have until January 24, 2023, to file a reply to the motion to dismiss.

ECF No. 88.


Summaries of

Pritchett v. Gentry

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Pritchett v. Gentry

Case Details

Full title:Shawn Pritchett, Petitioner v. Jo Gentry, et. al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-01694-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)