Opinion
No. 05-12-00023-CR
10-30-2012
Jeremy Jack PRITCHARD , Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
AFFIRM;
On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court
Rockwall County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2-10-482
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bri dges, Richter, and Lang
Opinion By Justice Bridges
Jeremy Jack Pritchard appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
120023F.U05