Opinion
Submitted April 12, 1999
June 7, 1999
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated December 24, 1997, as granted the defendant third-party plaintiff's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and denied the plaintiffs separate cross motions to amend the caption and strike the answer of the defendant third-party plaintiff.
Scheine, Fusco, Brandenstein Rada, P.C., Woodbury, N.Y. (John A. Zukowski of counsel), for appellant.
Laykind Summers, Franklin Square, N.Y. (Edward Faranda of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.
Alio, Ronan, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Dawn C. DeSimone and James S. Kehoe of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.
GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiff's cross motion to amend the caption and substituting therefor a provision granting the cross motion to the extent of adding Shep Messing Soccer Sport World, Inc., d/b/a Tennis Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., as a party defendant, and otherwise den in the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The trial court properly found that the defendant third-party plaintiff Tennis Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., complied with discovery demands ( cf., Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539), which production established that there were no genuine issues of fact and that this party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Di Sabato v. Soffes, 9 A.D.2d 297).
Shep Messing Soccer and Sport World d/b/a Tennis Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Shep Messing) may be added as a party defendant, as the plaintiffs claim against it relates back to the date his action was commenced against the original defendants ( see, Buran v. Coupal, 87 N.Y.2d 173). The claims arose out of a single occurrence. There is evidence that Shep Messing and the original defendant Tennis Sport World at Brookhaven, Inc., are united in interest ( see, Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co., 59 N.Y.2d 239), and Shep Messing's designee for the service of process was served in this action ( see, L L Plumbing Heating v. DePalo, 253 A.D.2d 517).