From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

, Priscilla P. v. (In re Javon Lawrence M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2015
126 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-03-26

In re JAVON LAWRENCE M., etc., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Priscilla P., Respondent–Appellant, SCO Family of Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant. Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, for respondent.



Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant. Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, for respondent.
GONZALEZ, P.J., ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2013, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondent mother had permanently neglected the subject child, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that, despite the agency's diligent efforts, the mother failed for the relevant time period to visit the child regularly, complete the required service plan, and address the problems that led to the child's placement, such as domestic violence by the child's father ( seeSocial Services Law § 384–b [7]; see also Matter of Brian T. [Jeannette F. ], 121 A.D.3d 500, 500–501, 994 N.Y.S.2d 120 [1st Dept.2014] ).

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that termination of the mother's parental rights is in the child's best interests ( see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). The agency caseworker testified that the foster mother wanted to adopt the child and that the child was happy in the foster home, where he has lived virtually his entire life. Further, the evidence showed that the mother visited the child only four times since November 2011, still had contact with the child's father, who engaged in domestic violence against her, and was unwilling to acknowledge the problems that led to the child's removal ( see Matter of Emily Jane Star R. [Evelyn R. ],117 A.D.3d 646, 647–648, 987 N.Y.S.2d 319 [2014] ).


Summaries of

, Priscilla P. v. (In re Javon Lawrence M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2015
126 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

, Priscilla P. v. (In re Javon Lawrence M.)

Case Details

Full title:In re JAVON LAWRENCE M., etc., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
126 A.D.3d 617
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2562