From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prior v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 11, 1969


Appeal from an order of the County Court, Broome County, granting respondent's motion for an installment payment order against appellant (CPLR 5226). Sections 137 Soc. Serv. and 137-a Soc. Serv. of the Social Services Law do not preclude the granting of the instant order. These sections exempt all public assistance and all wages, salary, commissions, or other compensation paid to public assistance recipients from levy or execution. However, we construe no intent on the part of the legislature in enacting sections 137 and 137-a to exempt recipients of public welfare assistance entirely from any levy and execution. It is only as to those funds specifically enumerated in these statutes that levy or execution is precluded. As to other sources of income not made immune by sections 137 and 137-a, the instant order is still applicable. Accordingly, the order must be affirmed. Order affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.


Summaries of

Prior v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Prior v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:EMMORY PRIOR, Respondent, v. DANIEL CUNNINGHAM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Matter of Banks v. Wyman

It is clear that the creditor (Sears) intends to repossess the heating system and is only withholding doing…