Opinion
13664N Index No. 653598/19 Case No. 2020–03412
04-22-2021
PRINKIPAS LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. CHARLTON TENANTS CORP. et al., Defendants–Appellants, ABC Management Corp. et al., Defendants.
Boyd Richards Parker & Colonnelli, P.L., New York (Jacqueline L. Aiello of counsel), for appellants. Law Offices of Robert M. Kaplan, White Plains (Robert M. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.
Boyd Richards Parker & Colonnelli, P.L., New York (Jacqueline L. Aiello of counsel), for appellants.
Law Offices of Robert M. Kaplan, White Plains (Robert M. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.
Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Moulton, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alan C. Marin, J.), entered on or about January 28, 2020, which granted plaintiff's motion for a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff a Yellowstone injunction (see Tag 380 v. Sprint Spectrum, 290 A.D.2d 404, 737 N.Y.S.2d 271 [1st Dept. 2002] ; see generally Graubard Mollen Horowitz Pomeranz & Shapiro v. 600 Third Avenue Assoc., 93 N.Y.2d 508, 514, 693 N.Y.S.2d 91, 715 N.E.2d 117 [1999] ). Plaintiff demonstrated that it was prepared and maintained the ability to "cure the alleged default[s] by means short of vacating the premises" ( Tag 380, 290 A.D.2d at 404, 737 N.Y.S.2d 271 ). The disputed factual issues as to plaintiff's alleged violations of the lease will be resolved in the plenary action (see Boi to Go, Inc. v. Second 800 No. 2 LLC, 58 A.D.3d 482, 870 N.Y.S.2d 334 [1st Dept. 2009] ).
Particularly in light of plaintiff's extensive expenditures and improvements to the leased premises, the court properly dispensed with the requirement of posting a bond (see WPA/Partners v. Port Imperial Ferry Corp., 307 A.D.2d 234, 237, 763 N.Y.S.2d 266 [1st Dept. 2003] ).