From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. Corizon Health Care

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Jan 26, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-447 JM (N.D. Ind. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-447 JM

01-26-2016

ROGER PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON HEALTH CARE, et al., Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

In the order (DE # 12) of November 19, 2015, this court explained that the amended complaint (DE # 8) filed by Roger Pringle, a pro se prisoner, alleging that Dr. Justin Marandet and Medical Director Ms. Cummings denied him medical treatment did not state a claim. He was granted until January 1, 2016, to file an amended complaint, but he has not done so. He was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, that this case would be dismissed.

For these reasons, this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the amended complaint (DE # 8) does not state a claim.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 26, 2016

s/James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Pringle v. Corizon Health Care

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Jan 26, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-447 JM (N.D. Ind. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Pringle v. Corizon Health Care

Case Details

Full title:ROGER PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON HEALTH CARE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-447 JM (N.D. Ind. Jan. 26, 2016)