From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prindle v. Rockland Transit Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 19, 1936
3 N.E.2d 194 (N.Y. 1936)

Summary

In Prindle v. Rockland Transit Corp. (271 N.Y. 580) we approved a charge that recovery could be had for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, a passenger, if the collision was due to the combined negligence of both drivers, that the negligence of the defendant's employee did not have to be the sole cause.

Summary of this case from Michelson v. Stuhlman

Opinion

Argued April 22, 1936

Decided May 19, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Elbert N. Oakes and James I. Cuff for appellant.

Mackey Rackow and Ralph O.L. Fay for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., HUBBS, CROUCH and FINCH, JJ. Dissenting: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and LOUGHRAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Prindle v. Rockland Transit Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 19, 1936
3 N.E.2d 194 (N.Y. 1936)

In Prindle v. Rockland Transit Corp. (271 N.Y. 580) we approved a charge that recovery could be had for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, a passenger, if the collision was due to the combined negligence of both drivers, that the negligence of the defendant's employee did not have to be the sole cause.

Summary of this case from Michelson v. Stuhlman
Case details for

Prindle v. Rockland Transit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. PRINDLE, as Administrator of the Estate of JOAN A. PRINDLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 19, 1936

Citations

3 N.E.2d 194 (N.Y. 1936)
3 N.E.2d 194

Citing Cases

Michelson v. Stuhlman

Assuming that the issue of her contributory negligence was for the jury ( Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N.Y. 71), she…

Anderson v. Burkardt

A passenger may recover for injuries received in a collision between two automobiles even though both drivers…