From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2016
637 F. App'x 590 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-1552

02-09-2016

PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA, FKA FUJIFILM USA, INC., Defendants

GEORGE PAZUNIAK, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant. SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI III, ERIN GIBSON, DAVID RAE KNUDSON; BRIAN K. ERICKSON, Austin, TX.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:12-cv-00779-RJS, Judge Richard J. Sullivan.

JUDGMENT

GEORGE PAZUNIAK, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant. SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI III, ERIN GIBSON, DAVID RAE KNUDSON; BRIAN K. ERICKSON, Austin, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2016
637 F. App'x 590 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Case Details

Full title:PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

637 F. App'x 590 (Fed. Cir. 2016)