Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Princeton City Sch. Dist. v. State Bd.

96 Ohio App. 3d 558 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Princeton City Sch. Dist. v. State Bd.

1 Citing case

  1. Haynam v. Ohio State Bd. of Educ.

    2011 Ohio 6499 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)

    The Supreme Court, moreover, has generally treated the grant of rule-making authority to local boards of education quite broadly. See Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emp. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Edn. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 300, 304; Princeton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Ohio State Bd. of Edn. (1994), 96 Ohio App.3d 558, 564. We find no convincing reason to believe that the State Board's rule-making authority under R.C. 3319.31(G) is somehow more constrained.