From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. United Traction Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 1953
282 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

November 12, 1953.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Albany County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.


The original action arose out of an injury suffered by the plaintiff when she alighted from a United Traction Company bus and stepped onto an inclined curbing between the street and the sidewalk in front of the premises owned by the defendant Brady. It is alleged that the curbing had been installed and maintained by the defendant city in a dangerous condition. It appears that the city had removed the original curbing and had installed the inclined curbing at the request of the defendant Brady in order to provide an entranceway to her premises. The city claims that it has a right of recovery over against the property owner because the work had been done for her special benefit. There is no merit to the city's claim. The work was all done upon the city's property by its employees. If there were any negligence in the manner in which the work was done, the negligence was that of the city and it has no right to recover over against the abutting property owner. The mere fact that the work was done at the request of the abutting owner and for her special benefit does not give rise to any right to indemnity for any liability which the city may incur on account of its own negligence. The employees of the city did not become the ad hoc employees of the abutting owner; they remained the employees of the city engaged in city work even though the city may have acted as an independent contractor for the abutting owner. Nothing to the contrary was held in Gordon v. City of Albany ( 278 App. Div. 233) ; see Mahar v. City of Albany ( 198 Misc. 904, affd. 278 App. Div. 1003). Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs to the defendant-respondent Brady against the defendant-appellant City of Albany.


Summaries of

Prince v. United Traction Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 1953
282 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Prince v. United Traction Company

Case Details

Full title:EDNA PRINCE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TRACTION COMPANY, Defendant; CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)