From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. Sweedler

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 17, 1964
166 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33471.

July 17, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Kastenbaum, Mamber, Gopman Epstein, Miami Beach, for petitioner.

Preddy Haddad, Miami, for Kenny Sweedler; Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 7, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prince v. Sweedler

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 17, 1964
166 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Prince v. Sweedler

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN PRINCE, PETITIONER, v. KENNY SWEEDLER, AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 17, 1964

Citations

166 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1964)