From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. Subia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 1:08-cv-01014-JF (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-01014-JF

09-23-2011

PATRICK PRINCE, Petitioner, v. RICHARD SUBIA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO TERMINATE MOTIONS


[re: dkt entries 53, 55, 57, 58]

The Clerk is directed to terminate docket entries 53, 55, 57, and 58 for the reasons discussed below.

Petitioner's Motion To Address Said Motions (dkt entry 53) requests that this Court address his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion (dkt entry 52). The Rule 60(b) motion has been denied (dkt entry 54). Accordingly, docket entry 53 shall be terminated as moot.

Petitioner filed a second Rule 60(b) motion (dkt entry 55), a motion to extend time to respond to the government's opposition (dkt entry 57), and a subsequent motion to withdraw the Rule 60(b) motion (dkt entry 58). The motion to withdraw is hereby granted. Accordingly, docket entries 55, 57, and 58 shall be terminated as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Prince v. Subia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 1:08-cv-01014-JF (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Prince v. Subia

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK PRINCE, Petitioner, v. RICHARD SUBIA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-01014-JF (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)