From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 25, 2020
605 S.W.3d 447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107882

08-25-2020

Jordan Lafayette PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J.; Kurt S. Odenwald, J.; and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jordan Lafayette Prince appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The circuit court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).


Summaries of

Prince v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 25, 2020
605 S.W.3d 447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Prince v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jordan Lafayette PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Aug 25, 2020

Citations

605 S.W.3d 447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)