Opinion
Case No. 1:07-CV-369.
March 31, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Marvin Lee Prince's pro se Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's July 27, 2007 Judgment dismissing his civil rights action. This is Plaintiff's third Motion for Reconsideration of the same matter. ( See Dkt. Nos. 32, 34.) The Court denied Plaintiff's last two motions by Orders of January 7, 2008, and February 4, 2008. ( See Dkt. Nos. 33, 37.) Plaintiff's current motion raises no new issues that have not previously been considered and decided. Further, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld this Court's Judgment. See Prince v. Ryder, Nos. 07-2031 07-2050 (6th Cir. Mar. 5, 2008).
Pursuant to Western District of Michigan Local Civil Rule 7.4(a), reconsideration is appropriate only when the movant "demonstrate[s] a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been mislead . . . [and] that a different disposition must result from the correction thereof." Plaintiff's allegations concerning "death ray devices" remain frivolous and delusional. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196, 1198-99 (6th Cir. 1990). No palpable error has been shown nor has it been shown that a different disposition should result. Simply put, the previous Judgment remains a proper disposition of the case for the reasons explained therein and in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Marvin Lee Prince's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that further motions for post-judgment relief and/or reconsideration shall not be accepted for filing by the Clerk unless accompanied by a certificate of the assigned Magistrate Judge that the motion is not frivolous or interposed for an improper purpose.