From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. Hammock

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 15, 1956
90 So. 2d 672 (Ala. 1956)

Opinion

8 Div. 776.

September 6, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 15, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Harold V. Hughston, J.

Wm. Stell, Russellville, for appellants.

Guin Guin, Russellville, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Franklin County, in Equity, overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint.

The appeal must be dismissed because the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 26 of the Supreme Court Rules, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix (now Rule 24 of Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. p. XIX et seq.). Such failure is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu. West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 368, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, 487, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

SIMPSON, MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prince v. Hammock

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 15, 1956
90 So. 2d 672 (Ala. 1956)
Case details for

Prince v. Hammock

Case Details

Full title:Oma PRINCE and Gifford Prince v. Charles HAMMOCK, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 15, 1956

Citations

90 So. 2d 672 (Ala. 1956)
90 So. 2d 672

Citing Cases

United Security Life Insurance Co. v. White

CATES, Judge. Appellee has moved that the appeal be dismissed because the record does not comply with Supreme…

Tidwell v. State

" Under Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Powell v.…