From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. County of Santa Clara

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 22, 2005
No. C03-04303 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2005)

Opinion

No. C03-04303 RMW.

December 22, 2005

ANN MILLER RAVEL, County Counsel (S.B. #62139) LISA HERRICK, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #157115) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL San Jose, California, Attorneys for Defendants.

CHARLES A. BONNER Attorney for Plaintiff.


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER


STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff, Cleveland Prince, and defendants, County of Santa Clara, Probation Department of the County of Santa Clara, and John Cavalli, through their undersigned counsel, that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT the Court shall direct the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the entire action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

ORDER

THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. The entire action be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

2. The clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the entire action with prejudice.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.


Summaries of

Prince v. County of Santa Clara

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 22, 2005
No. C03-04303 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2005)
Case details for

Prince v. County of Santa Clara

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND PRINCE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, BOARD OF…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2005

Citations

No. C03-04303 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2005)