From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prince v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 1, 2022
No. 3281-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 1, 2022)

Opinion

3281-21

02-01-2022

Robert David Prince & Krystal Diane Prince Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On May 5, 2021, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Krystal Diane Prince on the ground that no notice of deficiency was issued to her for tax year 2015 that would permit her to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion, petitioners failed to do so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's above-referenced motion to dismiss is granted and so much of this case relating to Krystal Diane Prince is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that the caption in this case is amended to read: "Robert David Prince, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".

The Court encourages all litigants to register for electronic access (eAccess) so that they may electronically file and view documents in their Tax Court cases. If you currently file in paper and/or receive paper service from the Court, you are encouraged to register for eAccess by emailing dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov. If you are not currently registered for eAccess, please do not attempt to electronically file documents in a pending case without first contacting dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov.


Summaries of

Prince v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 1, 2022
No. 3281-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Prince v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Robert David Prince & Krystal Diane Prince Petitioners v. Commissioner of…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 1, 2022

Citations

No. 3281-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 1, 2022)