From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prime Datum, Inc. v. Baldor Elec. Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 4, 2016
2016-1051 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1051

11-04-2016

PRIME DATUM, INC., Appellant v. BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellee

JOSEPH LUCCI, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN FRANK MURPHY, JEB BACON OBLAK. PAUL B. HUNT, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA PAUL LARSEN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,286.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH LUCCI, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN FRANK MURPHY, JEB BACON OBLAK. PAUL B. HUNT, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA PAUL LARSEN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 4, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Prime Datum, Inc. v. Baldor Elec. Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 4, 2016
2016-1051 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Prime Datum, Inc. v. Baldor Elec. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PRIME DATUM, INC., Appellant v. BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 2016

Citations

2016-1051 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2016)