From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Primack v. Murphy

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 3, 2023
2:23-cv-00359-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00359-JAD-BNW

07-03-2023

Ashley Primack, Plaintiff v. Taylor Murphy, et al., Defendants


REMAND ORDER

[ECF NOS. 5, 13]

JENNIFER-A. DORSEY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Ashley Primack filed this state-law action in Nevada State Court against the driver she alleges was responsible for an accident in which she sustained injuries, the drivers' parents, and Primack's own insurers. One of those insurers-Progressive Casualty Insurance Company- removed this case to this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 1441(b) based on diversity of citizenship. Primack argues that because she, the driver, and the driver's parents are all citizens of Nevada, diversity is lacking and this case must be remanded back to state court. For the reasons stated on the record during today's hearing on that motion to remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

ECF No. 13.

• Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED; and

• The Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case back to the Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 19, Case No. A-23-865125-C, and CLOSE THIS CASE.

• Geico's motion to dismiss [ECF No. 5] is DENIED without prejudice as moot.


Summaries of

Primack v. Murphy

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 3, 2023
2:23-cv-00359-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Primack v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:Ashley Primack, Plaintiff v. Taylor Murphy, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 3, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00359-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2023)