Prillman v. Parsons

Full title: JEAN PRILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PARSONS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 20, 2024

Civil Action 24-CV-0605 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-CV-0605

09-20-2024

JEAN PRILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PARSONS, et al., Defendants.

JOHN M. GALLAGHER, J.

ORDER

JOHN M. GALLAGHER, J.

AND NOW, this 20^th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants George Parsons, Victor Koszi, Anel Vargas, Heather Lanza, Jeremy Schick, and Robert Worrall's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), Plaintiff Jean Prillman's “Motion to Proceed,” construed as a Response to the Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 17), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as follows: Prillman's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and her state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. The “Motion to Proceed,” which the Court has considered as a Response to the Defendants' Motion, is DENIED to the extent Prillman is asking the Court not to dismiss her claims.

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.