From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prieto v. Scheeler's Cafe de Marco, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jan 24, 2017
Case No: 2:16-cv-139-FtM-99CM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2017)

Opinion

Case No: 2:16-cv-139-FtM-99CM

01-24-2017

GERARDO PRIETO, Plaintiff, v. SCHEELER'S CAFE DE MARCO, INC., individually and SANDY FRANCHINO, individually, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #42), filed January 9, 2017, recommending that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. #39) be granted, the settlement agreement be approved, and the case dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #42) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. #39) is granted and the Settlement Agreement and General Release (Doc. #41-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 24th day of January, 2017.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies:
Hon. Carol Mirando
United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Prieto v. Scheeler's Cafe de Marco, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jan 24, 2017
Case No: 2:16-cv-139-FtM-99CM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Prieto v. Scheeler's Cafe de Marco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERARDO PRIETO, Plaintiff, v. SCHEELER'S CAFE DE MARCO, INC., individually…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2017

Citations

Case No: 2:16-cv-139-FtM-99CM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 24, 2017)