From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. Sobeck

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 2003
357 N.C. 159 (N.C. 2003)

Summary

In Priest, the Court was determining whether to hear cross appeals from a partial grant and partial denial of summary judgment, which orders were interlocutory. Plaintiffs, members of a union, had brought defamation claims against the author of a union newsletter, a publication that alleged plaintiffs supported the hiring of non-union workers.

Summary of this case from Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper

Opinion

No. 599A02

Filed 2 May 2003

Appeal and Error — appealability — partial summary judgment — final judgment as to some claims — substantial right

The decision of the Court of Appeals dismissing as interlocutory appeals by both plaintiffs and defendants of an order granting partial summary judgment in an action for libel per se, class two libel, and libel per quod even though the trial court certified the case for immediate review under Rule 54(b) is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that (1) there was a final judgment as to one or more of plaintiffs' claims, and (2) the denial of defendants' summary judgment motion implicated defendants' First Amendment right to free speech and thus affected a substantial right.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 153 N.C.App. 662, 571 S.E.2d 75 (2002), dismissing as interlocutory an appeal of an order granting partial summary judgment entered 4 September 2001 by Judge Melzer A. Morgan, Jr., in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 April 2003.

Schiller Schiller, P.L.L.C., by David G. Schiller and Marvin Schiller, for plaintiff-appellants and -appellees. Smith, James, Rowlett Cohen, LLP, by Seth R. Cohen, for defendant-appellants and -appellees. The Bussian Law Firm, PLLC, by John A. Bussian, on behalf of the North Carolina Press Association, amicus curiae.


For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to that court to address the merits of the appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Priest v. Sobeck

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 2003
357 N.C. 159 (N.C. 2003)

In Priest, the Court was determining whether to hear cross appeals from a partial grant and partial denial of summary judgment, which orders were interlocutory. Plaintiffs, members of a union, had brought defamation claims against the author of a union newsletter, a publication that alleged plaintiffs supported the hiring of non-union workers.

Summary of this case from Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper
Case details for

Priest v. Sobeck

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA PRIEST and BETTY LOU SKINNER v. THOMAS SOBECK and MAKE-UP ARTISTS…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2003

Citations

357 N.C. 159 (N.C. 2003)
579 S.E.2d 250

Citing Cases

Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper

The complaint arose from a television advertisement broadcast during a political campaign and alleged…

Topping v. Meyers

Sherrill v. Amerada Hess Corp. , 130 N.C. App. 711, 719, 504 S.E.2d 802, 807 (1998). Our Courts have…