From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. McGinley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 18 - 138 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18 - 138

08-02-2018

MARKEZ PRIEST, Petitioner, v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY, Respondents.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Markez Priest ("Petitioner") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, wherein he challenges his judgment of sentence for first degree murder and possessing a firearm without a license. (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court, all pretrial matters were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan.

Respondents filed a Response to the Petition on March 1, 2018. (ECF No. 3.) On July 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Petition be denied and that no certificate of appealability issue. (ECF No. 5.) The R&R was served on the parties and Petitioner filed written objections that were docketed on July 30, 2018. (ECF No. 7.)

In resolving a party's objections, the Court conducts a de novo review of any part of the R&R that has been properly objected to. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition, as well as receive further evidence or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Id.

After careful de novo review, the following Order is now entered.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 5) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondents and mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

s. Arthur J. Schwab

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge cc: Markez Priest

JQ-0881

SCI Coal Township

1 Kelley Drive

Coal Township, PA 17866-1021

Counsel for Respondents

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Priest v. McGinley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 18 - 138 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Priest v. McGinley

Case Details

Full title:MARKEZ PRIEST, Petitioner, v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18 - 138 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2018)