From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. Brummer

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Jul 18, 2008
CAUSE NO.: 1:06-CV-065-TS (N.D. Ind. Jul. 18, 2008)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 1:06-CV-065-TS.

July 18, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Cosbey's Report and Recommendation [DE 92], which was docketed March 11, 2008. The Report and Recommendation addressed the Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [76] and Motion for Damage Award in Default Judgment Against Defendant Brummer [DE 84].

The Court notes that as more than 10 days have passed since attempts were made to serve the Defendant with Report and Recommendation, which was sent to two addresses for the Defendant but returned as undeliverable/refused, see DE 93, 94, any objections are now waived.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court now ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a default and default judgment against the Defendant in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

Priest v. Brummer

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Jul 18, 2008
CAUSE NO.: 1:06-CV-065-TS (N.D. Ind. Jul. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Priest v. Brummer

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLEE W. PRIEST, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GREGORY BRUMMER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

Date published: Jul 18, 2008

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 1:06-CV-065-TS (N.D. Ind. Jul. 18, 2008)

Citing Cases

MNW, LLC v. Mega Auto Group, Inc.

Davis v. Hutchins, 321 F.3d 641, 648 (7th Cir.2003) (“[W]hen a judge orders a default entered, the factual…

McClain v. TP Orthodontics

The "requirement implies more than a person being angered, offended, appalled, or even shocked. It connotes…