From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. Bentley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2021
2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN

11-02-2021

DAVID PRIEST, Plaintiff, v. BENTLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 30.) Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 24, 2021, (ECF No. 30), are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Bentley is dismissed. 2


Summaries of

Priest v. Bentley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2021
2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Priest v. Bentley

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PRIEST, Plaintiff, v. BENTLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2021)