From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRIDMORE v. HAWS

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 20, 2010
No. C 08-02941 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 08-02941 SBA (PR).

January 20, 2010


ORDER GRANTING FIFTH REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PETITIONER TO FILE TRAVERSE


Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court directed Respondent to file an answer to the petition and granted Petitioner leave to file a traverse. Respondent has filed an answer. Petitioner now moves for a fifth extension of time to file a traverse. Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a traverse within sixty (60) days of the date this order is signed. No further extensions of time will be granted in this case absent exigent circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

PRIDMORE v. HAWS

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 20, 2010
No. C 08-02941 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2010)
Case details for

PRIDMORE v. HAWS

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. PRIDMORE, Petitioner, v. FREDRICK B. HAWS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 20, 2010

Citations

No. C 08-02941 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2010)

Citing Cases

Rush v. Janda

In sum, there is no merit to Petitioner's contention that the trial court prejudicially erred by denying…