From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pridgen v. Bureau of Highways

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 15, 2010
401 F. App'x 824 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2385.

Submitted: October 21, 2010.

Decided: November 15, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1.-08-CV-02826-WDO).

Phillip M. Pridgen, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Grant Cook, Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Phillip M. Pridgen appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pridgen v. Dep't of Pub. Works, No. 1:08-cv-02826-WDO, 2009 WL 4726619 (D.Md. Dec. 1, 2009). We deny Pridgen's motion for appointment of counsel as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Pridgen v. Bureau of Highways

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 15, 2010
401 F. App'x 824 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Pridgen v. Bureau of Highways

Case Details

Full title:Phillip M. PRIDGEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 2010

Citations

401 F. App'x 824 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Munoz v. Baltimore Cnty.

However, whether the Plaintiff intended to omit those responses or whether he was required by Maryland law to…