From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pride v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jan 16, 2013
No. 3:11-cv-339 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-339

01-16-2013

DORIS DIANE PRIDE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


(PHILLIPS/SHIRLEY)


JUDGMENT ORDER

This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley. [Doc. 21.] There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with the magistrate judge's conclusion that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] be DENIED and Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 19] be GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT

Debra C. Poplin

CLERK OF COURT


Summaries of

Pride v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jan 16, 2013
No. 3:11-cv-339 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Pride v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DORIS DIANE PRIDE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-339 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)