From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Walker

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 2014
NO. 14-14-00434-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-14-00434-CV

07-03-2014

JOE E. PRICE, Appellant v. ROBERT B. WALKER, ET. AL., Appellees


Motion Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-27248


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed January 22, 2014. Appellant filed an untimely motion for new trial on February 24, 2014. Appellant's notice of appeal was filed June 2, 2014.

The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely post-judgment motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. When appellant has filed a timely post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).

The certificate of service on appellant's motion for new trial reflects that the motion was served timely on February 21, 2014. Even if we determine that appellant made a bona fide attempt to file a timely post-judgment motion, appellant's notice of appeal is untimely.

Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period provided by Rule 26.3.

On June 17, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court's intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). In response to the court's notice, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal stating that he timely paid the filing fee, did not receive timely notice of the judgment, and his counsel experienced hospitalization and the death of an immediate family member during the time in which the notice of appeal was due.

"[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court's jurisdiction." Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. Therefore, we do not have discretion to grant appellant's motion.

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a permits extension of the deadline to file notice of appeal if a party or his attorney did not receive actual notice of the judgment within 20 days after the judgment is signed. The record does not reflect that appellant sought relief under Rule 306a, or that appellant did not receive actual notice of the judgment.
--------

Accordingly, appellant's motion to extend time to file notice of appeal is denied, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.


Summaries of

Price v. Walker

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 2014
NO. 14-14-00434-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Price v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:JOE E. PRICE, Appellant v. ROBERT B. WALKER, ET. AL., Appellees

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 3, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-14-00434-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)