From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2022
Civil Action 19-5263 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-5263

01-03-2022

MAURICE M. PRICE, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition, amendments, response, and available state court records, there being no timely objection filed by petitioner and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Price v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2022
Civil Action 19-5263 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Price v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE M. PRICE, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 19-5263 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2022)