From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Orchid Cellmark, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 11, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-246J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-246J.

September 11, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


William Price's civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was received by the Clerk of Court on October 24, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 (now Rules 72.C and 72.D) of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on August 18, 2009, recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) be treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment and be granted. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. Price filed objections on September 1, 2009 (Doc. 38) and Defendant filed a Response on September 10, 2009 (Doc. 39).

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) is treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment and is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 37), dated August 18, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Price v. Orchid Cellmark, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 11, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-246J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Price v. Orchid Cellmark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PRICE, Plaintiff, v. ORCHID CELLMARK, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 11, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-246J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2009)