From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Hetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 3, 2015
CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv824-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv824-WHA (WO)

03-03-2015

STANLEY D. PRICE, #251276, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents.


OPINION and ORDER

On February 11, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 14). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby DISMISSED.

Done this the 3rd day of March, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Price v. Hetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 3, 2015
CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv824-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Price v. Hetzel

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY D. PRICE, #251276, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 3, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv824-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Williams

I.A.D., Art. III(a). See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 726 (1985) ("from the language of the [IAD] ... a…