From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Flicker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2409 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2409 FCD PAN P.

August 28, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 17, 2006 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Price v. Flicker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2409 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Price v. Flicker

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. PRICE, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN FLICKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2409 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)