From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRICE v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL/VITASALUS

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 26, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-cv-00339-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00339-RLH-PAL.

May 26, 2011


ORDER (Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation-#2)


Before this Court is the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation (#2) of the United States Magistrate Judge, entered by the Honorable Peggy A. Leen regarding Plaintiff Mary A. Price's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1, filed Mar. 3, 2011). Two objections (#4, #5) were filed to Magistrate Judge Leen's Report and Recommendation in accordance with Local Rule LR IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. This matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen should be accepted and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation (#2) entered March 18, 2011 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and Plaintiff Mary A. Price's Complaint (#3) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

PRICE v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL/VITASALUS

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 26, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-cv-00339-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

PRICE v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL/VITASALUS

Case Details

Full title:MARY A. PRICE, Plaintiff, v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL/VITASALUS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00339-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 26, 2011)