Opinion
8:24-cv-314-WFJ-UAM
06-25-2024
CHARLES M. PRICE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SEAN P. FLYNN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative decision denying his claim for Social Security disability benefits (see Doc. 1). At this juncture, the Commissioner seeks entry of an order reversing and remanding the case for further administrative action. Specifically, the Commissioner asserts:
On remand, the case will be remanded to an administrative law judge who will offer the claimant an opportunity for a supplemental hearing and issue a new decision.
(Doc. 22 at 1). Plaintiff has no objection.
Upon consideration, it is hereby RECOMMENDED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 22) be GRANTED.
2. The Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and the case be REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff and close this case.
IT IS SO REPORTED.
NOTICE TO PARTIES
A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.