From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roulette Price v. Catanzariti

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 19, 2016
158 A.3d 65 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 177 WAL 2016

09-19-2016

Roulette PRICE, Respondent v. Alan CATANZARITI, D.P.M., Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to Petitioner's first issue. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, as issues neither raised nor preserved for appellate review are waived and may not constitute the basis for reversal of a trial court's decision. See, e.g., Wiegand v. Wiegand, 337 A.2d 256 (Pa. 1975). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for determination based upon full consideration of the issues raised and preserved for appeal by Respondent.


Summaries of

Roulette Price v. Catanzariti

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 19, 2016
158 A.3d 65 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Roulette Price v. Catanzariti

Case Details

Full title:ROULETTE PRICE, Respondent v. ALAN CATANZARITI, D.P.M., Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 19, 2016

Citations

158 A.3d 65 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Rutyna v. Schweers

But it does not preclude us from taking into account the fact that Dr. Foster was determined to be a…

Rutyna v. Schweers

However, on September 19, 2016, our Supreme Court vacated the order of this Court. Price v. Catanzariti, 2016…