Opinion
DOCKET NO. A-2504-15T2
07-11-2017
LARRY PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BHADO and BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC and UNION CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendants-Respondents.
Larry Price, appellant, argued the cause pro se. Gregory F. Kotchick argued the cause for respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Durkin and Durkin LLP, attorneys; Mr. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief). Alonso and Navarrete, LLC, attorneys for respondent Bhado and Bhado Development, LLC, join in the brief of respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3. Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-3854-15. Larry Price, appellant, argued the cause pro se. Gregory F. Kotchick argued the cause for respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Durkin and Durkin LLP, attorneys; Mr. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief). Alonso and Navarrete, LLC, attorneys for respondent Bhado and Bhado Development, LLC, join in the brief of respondent Union City Zoning Board of Adjustment. PER CURIAM
The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In accordance with their consent order of dismissal, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.
CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION