From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Airlift International, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 20, 1967
201 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. 67-584.

July 20, 1967.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Raymond G. Nathan, J.

Horton Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson Ward, Miami Beach, and Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay Kimbrell, Miami, for Airlift International.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Milton J. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Florida Securities Comm.

Hansford D. Tyler, Jr. and David D. Phillips, Miami, for Voyle C. Johnson.

Roger H. Edwards, South Miami, for Harold Swartz.

Marchant Perkins, Miami, for Robert M. Hewitt.

Shutts Bowen, Miami, for Hargis and McKeller.

Boris Spaseff, Miami, for Leo Gutstein.

Moore Moore, Miami, for William R. Price.

Robert L. Achor, Miami, receiver.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.


This interlocutory appeal is brought by one of several defendants to review an injunctive order and an order appointing a receiver for that defendant. The receiver was appointed pursuant to the motion of the intervening Florida Securities Commission acting under authority of Sections 517.19(6) and 517.19(7), Fla. Stat., F.S.A.

Appellant contends that the statute does not authorize the injunctive order and the appointment of the receiver, and that if authorized the trial judge has abused the discretion vested in him by the statute. We hold that the record fully sustains the action of the chancellor, and that the statute clearly intended the action taken when necessary or advisable for the purpose of protecting the public.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Price v. Airlift International, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 20, 1967
201 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Price v. Airlift International, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. PRICE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LAST DIRECTOR AND TRUSTEE OF JAMES H…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 20, 1967

Citations

201 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

WEE MAC CORPORATION v. STATE

In our opinion, the third point does not present reversible error in view of the obvious need of the court…

Johnson v. Kruglak

The extensive history of this litigation is revealed by the prior appeals in the cause. Price v. Airlift…