From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prevedello v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 24, 2015
CV 12-1568-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)

Opinion

          Christopher Prevedello, Petitioner, Pro se, Chowchilla, CA.

          For Matthew Cate, Respondent: Peggy Z Huang, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GEORGE H. KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Prevedello v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 24, 2015
CV 12-1568-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Prevedello v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER PREVEDELLO, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

Citations

CV 12-1568-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)